Skip to main content

UK government accused of running flawed Feed-in Tariff consultation

The Renewable Energy Association (REA), RenewableUK and the Anaerobic Digestion and Bioresources Association (ABDA) have all accused the UK government of running a flawed Feed-in Tariff consultation.

"The UK's leading renewable energy trade bodies have formally complained to the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), accusing it of trying to rush through "damaging" changes to the popular feed-in tariff subsidy scheme.

Renewable UK, the Renewable Energy Association (REA), British Hydropower Association, and Anaerobic Digestion and Bioresources Association (ABDA), have all accused DECC of failing to comply with Whitehall best practices, when the department launched a four-week consultation during summer recess without publishing an impact assessment alongside it.

In the consultation, which officially closed yesterday, DECC proposed removing a key element of the feed-in tariff policy, known as pre-accreditation, which sets the level of subsidy a project can expect to receive before it is built. The measure gives certainty that a project will be protected from any cuts to the subsidy rate for 12 months of the construction phase.

The government wants to remove pre-accreditation as an emergency measure to reduce the attractiveness of small-scale renewable energy technologies, ahead of a full-scale review of the feed-in tariff scheme later this year.

DECC argues the changes are required to ease pressure on the UK's levy control framework (LCF) clean energy subsidy budget, which officials fear could overshoot its target by £1.5bn by 2020. Government figures suggest that feed-in tariff spending could nearly double from £1.1bn this year to £2.1bn in 2020/2021.

DECC also argues the feed-in tariff policy is overachieving on its goals, as it has already delivered more than 700,000 renewable energy installations against an expectation of 750,000 by 2020.
But the letter sent on Tuesday, which is also signed by the Solar Trade Association, Scottish Renewables, and Community Energy England, argues DECC is trying to rush the changes through without proper scrutiny by launching the consultation in the middle of the summer holidays.
It says the policy should have been at least 12 weeks to give all interested parties sufficient time to respond.

The trade associations also complained that the consultation lacked an accompanying impact assessment, which made it "impossible" for respondents to answer the consultation questions appropriately.

Supporters of the current policy argue it is critical for mobilising investment in small-scale renewables projects from community groups and businesses – sectors ministers have previously said they want to see stepping up investment in clean energy capacity. Industry insiders fear without pre-accreditation financial directors will be reluctant to sign off investments in new renewables projects, because of the risk that even minor project delays could result in installations receiving a lower level of incentive payments than expected.

Separately, RenewableUK said its members had already reported a hiatus in project development and were struggling to secure financing as a result of the changes.

"Renewable energy projects are unlike fossil fuel projects," RenewableUK states in its official consultation response. "There is not a cheap upfront cost followed by an expensive fluctuating operating cost that can simply be passed on to customers as and when commodity prices increase.

"Renewable energy projects have a one-off upfront cost, and require some degree of certainty as to the income that they will receive for the energy generated once in operation, in order to judge the viability of the project."

RenewableUK also accused the government of using "a false argument" by claiming pre-accreditation is to blame for surges in feed-in tariff spending. It said that in fact the opposite was true, and that the mechanism gave the government greater visibility over the future project pipeline.
Individual developers have also complained about the changes. Brett Pingree at Endurance Wind Power said farmers would be hit particularly hard by the removal of pre-accreditation.

"Even small wind projects take a long time to install because of lead times involved in securing planning approval and grid connection, as well as weather and periods of site inaccessibility such as during planting, growing and harvest seasons," he said. "For this reason, the 12-month allowance to complete the project becomes critical for arranging finance, as without the assurance of the FIT rate, banks will not provide loans."

Along with the rest of the industry, Pingree says the government should introduce the changes at the same time as the upcoming wider feed-in tariff review, to provide more certainty to investors about the future shape of the policy.

A spokeswoman for DECC was formulating a response to BusinessGreen's request for comment at the time of publication.


Popular posts from this blog

The Battle of the Blogs? Whitlock goes to War...

Good day folks, you're all in for a bit of a treat as it happens, so I hope you're sitting comfortably. Before I go any further, I should issue a 'long read' warning. This blog piece is going to be fairly long, quite involved in its detail, but hopefully very enjoyable if you despise and detest climate change denial, as I do. But first, an explanation of the circumstances.

The other day, on Twitter, I indulged in a bit of regular fun-poking at James Delingpole, as I often do because, quite simply, the man just invites it. For those not in the know, Delingpole is a pretty nasty character really. He writes regular blog pieces and op-eds for Breitbart and The Spectator, usually on climate change, but also on other subjects as well. He is usually, and seemingly, unashamedly vicious, as will become apparent in my coverage of him and his behaviour in this piece. Given his behaviour, I am not afraid, occasionally to indulge in a bit of 'ad-hominem' warfare myself, ind…
As reported in Renewable Energy Magazine (REM), Hungarian utility NKM Mobilitas Ltd (Mobiliti) is aiming to establish a new EV charging network across the country, with a target of 100 chargers by the end of 2018, in cooperation with Hungarian local authorities. As part of this programme, the utility has ordered 12 Veefil-RT 50 kilowatt DC fast chargers from Tritium, an Australian company that recently opened a European HQ, service centre and assembly facility in Amsterdam.

Currently, EVs account for only 6,000 of the 3.8 million cars on Hungarian roads, but this figure is increasing rapidly. In Q1 2018, EV's accounted for 5.1 percent of all new car sales. Growth of EVs has been assisted by subsidies paid to owners alongside incentives such as grants of up to 5,000 euros, free car registration and reduced or free parking.

According to Reuters, Finnish utility is also working with NKM Mobilitas to expand the Hungarian network. Currently, the only chargers in Hungary are located in …

5 Companies and Their Efforts to Reduce the Environmental Impact of Manufacturing

By Rana Tarakji
The Industrial Revolution has undoubtedly affected the environment. From pollution to global warming, the environment has taken on a lot of the burden for many of the advancements that humans have enjoyed.
Unfortunately, the manufacturing industry is one of the biggest contributors to the significant damages and hazards on the environment. Manufacturing companies are among the biggest producers of solid, liquid, and gaseous wastes that lead to huge levels of pollution.
Although many manufacturing companies still do not have policies and practices in place to reduce their negative impact on the environment, there are many who are taking the lead to a more sustainable and environment-friendly approach.
Coca Cola When it comes to beverage manufacturers, Coca Cola is among the biggest around the world. They have started taking on a more responsible environmental commitment by making water preservation, sustainable packaging, and energy and climate protection among their goals.…