Skip to main content

Do pay attention Mr Jones....

Griff Rhys Jones is the latest to join the ranks of NIMBY anti-renewable energy campaigners, but at least he accepts climate change is happening, it's just that he is wrong on renewable energy and even more so on nuclear

Yes you ARE a NIMBY Mr Griff Rhys Jones, no matter how much you deny it. Furthermore, it is quite frankly incredible, you having admitted that climate change concerns you, that you have decided to take the position that you have on renewable energy.

"It is about the planning of it" you say, in your article today in The Daily Mail. "or perhaps the lack of planning of it, that is threatening to randomly desecrate our landscape"

Well, have you actually stopped to think about what climate change will do to our landscape if it is allowed to run away and become worse until it reaches a tipping point? You only have to look around you and you will, hopefully, see the effect that climate change is already having on our landscape - ruined crops, houses ruined by flash floods, heathland destroyed by wildfires. And that's just the start of it.

Let's take Scotland as an example. Already the habitat of the Snow Bunting is receding each year with the decline of snow cover on mountains. Rising sea levels are already presenting a serious threat to some of the Scottish Islands and will do so increasingly as time advances and climate change gets worse. There are many more examples of how nature and the environment in the UK is already being affected by climate change, and I shouldn't have to remind you of this with your obvious knowledge of the British countryside.

Is nuclear really an option faced with the dire predictions of how bad climate change could get if we don't do something about it now? No, not really. For a start, it takes anything between 7 and 14 years to build just one nuclear plant. At the present time, nuclear only meets a small amount of our national energy demand.

Furthermore, the claim that nuclear doesn't add to greenhouse gas emissions is incorrect. Nuclear actually releases heat in vast amounts and so therefore remains a contributor to climate change.

The only real solution to stopping dangerous climate change is renewable energy: it is clean, cheap and it provides us with energy security. Relying on nuclear is not only foolhardy, it also wastes time that we could spend on adding to our renewable energy infrastructure. It also provides us with a reliable way of adding much-needed jobs to the economy for those who are interested purely in economics, as Germany has shown. 

Those who oppose the development of renewable energy on the basis of an imagined destructive effect on our landscape are living in a dream world, particularly given the fact that if climate change is allowed to worsen, the effects on our land will make present concerns about renewable energy on the land look like childish insecurity. 

Opponents of renewable energy taking up such a position are leaving in a dream world, based on an idyllic fantasy of Britain drawn from the romantic days of Blake and Wordsworth, quaint but deluded. 

I am very sad to see that you have joined them Mr Jones.... 


Popular posts from this blog

The Battle of the Blogs? Whitlock goes to War...

Good day folks, you're all in for a bit of a treat as it happens, so I hope you're sitting comfortably. Before I go any further, I should issue a 'long read' warning. This blog piece is going to be fairly long, quite involved in its detail, but hopefully very enjoyable if you despise and detest climate change denial, as I do. But first, an explanation of the circumstances.

The other day, on Twitter, I indulged in a bit of regular fun-poking at James Delingpole, as I often do because, quite simply, the man just invites it. For those not in the know, Delingpole is a pretty nasty character really. He writes regular blog pieces and op-eds for Breitbart and The Spectator, usually on climate change, but also on other subjects as well. He is usually, and seemingly, unashamedly vicious, as will become apparent in my coverage of him and his behaviour in this piece. Given his behaviour, I am not afraid, occasionally to indulge in a bit of 'ad-hominem' warfare myself, ind…

Array Technologies leads US market in solar tracker shipments

5 Companies and Their Efforts to Reduce the Environmental Impact of Manufacturing

By Rana Tarakji
The Industrial Revolution has undoubtedly affected the environment. From pollution to global warming, the environment has taken on a lot of the burden for many of the advancements that humans have enjoyed.
Unfortunately, the manufacturing industry is one of the biggest contributors to the significant damages and hazards on the environment. Manufacturing companies are among the biggest producers of solid, liquid, and gaseous wastes that lead to huge levels of pollution.
Although many manufacturing companies still do not have policies and practices in place to reduce their negative impact on the environment, there are many who are taking the lead to a more sustainable and environment-friendly approach.
Coca Cola When it comes to beverage manufacturers, Coca Cola is among the biggest around the world. They have started taking on a more responsible environmental commitment by making water preservation, sustainable packaging, and energy and climate protection among their goals.…