Rather than a straight A-B, the line stretches from London to Manchester with a branch extending from the main route to Leeds via the East Midlands. Apparently, there won't be any immediate calling points between London and the West Midlands apart from a spur to Birmingham, which immediately raises questions in my mind about what precisely is the business case for this project, as it seems to me that completely misses a lot of local business located between the two destinations.
In principle the project is supported by the three main political parties. The government's case is that it will provide additional capacity on the rail network to the Midlands and the North, despite the fact that the West Coast Main Line was upgraded as recently as 2008 and plans for longer trains and improved signalling on that route. A member of the HS2 Action Alliance has criticized the government's projections as well as the assessment methodology. In addition the HS2 proposals have been opposed by numerous local authorities along the route. The Green Party support High Speed Rail in principle if it is restricted to 190 mph which would enable it to use existing transport corridors, however the current proposals were opposed by the party at their Spring 2011 conference. The Wildlife Trusts have criticised the scheme because of the effect on 4 SSSI's and over 40 other types of nature site along the route.
The first phase of the project will involve the demoliton of over 400 houses including nine which are Grade II listed. David Lidington the MP for Aylesbury has raised concerns that the line could damage the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, the Colne Valley Regional Park on the outskirts of London and various other areas of Green Belt.
A report commissioned by the Department of Transport in 2007 found there were no significant carbon reductions obtained by building a line from London to Manchester and that in fact carbon emissions would be greater than if no new line was built at all. The High Speed Rail Command paper published in 2010 found that carbon emissions would be increased by 440,000 tonnes per year.
High Speed Rail, The National Interest and the North South Divide
HS2 - A summary for MP's
Financial analysis of HS2 by Action Against HS2 Chiltern Routes
Stop HS2 Arguments:
Could HS2 have used the route of the old Great Central Railway Instead?
North of the Chilterns the line would follow the main road past Aylesbury before making use of the largely preserved track-bed of the former Great Central railway until Brackley. There is at least one petition which advocates rebuilding the Great Central instead of building HS2: