Skip to main content

David McKay's estimate of onshore wind energy

This is an extract from McKay's book Sustainable Energy Without The Hot Air

Potential energy from onshore wind in the UK can be calculated by multiplying the average power per unit of land area covered by a wind farm by the area per person (population density) thus arriving at the power available per person from wind.

Assuming the wind speed is 6 metres per second (13 miles per hour or 22 km/h), the power per unit area of a wind farm is 2W per square metre. In reality the figure of 6 metres per second is probably an over estimate for many locations in Britain, Cambridge only recorded such a figure on about 30 occasions during the course of 2006.

The population density is about 250 people per square kilometre which is 4000 square meters per person. Therefore wind could generate (assuming the 6 metres per second figure for wind speed) 8000 W per person.

This is assuming that wind turbines stretched across the entire country.

If you convert that figure to the commonly used unit for power (kilowatt-hour which is termed one unit on electricity bills and costs about 10 pence) that is 200 kilowatt hours per day per person.

If we imagine only 10% of the country being covered by wind turbines, that reduces the figure to 20 kWh/d per person. This is half the power used to drive an average fossil-fuel car for 50km per day.

Therefore energy generated by onshore wind is much less than our current consumption of energy.

Compared to other countries, the wind turbines needed to generate 20 kWh/d per person would be fifty times the current wind energy hardware of Denmark and seven times that of Germany. Essentially, double the entire fleet of wind turbines in the world.


Popular posts from this blog

The Battle of the Blogs? Whitlock goes to War...

Good day folks, you're all in for a bit of a treat as it happens, so I hope you're sitting comfortably. Before I go any further, I should issue a 'long read' warning. This blog piece is going to be fairly long, quite involved in its detail, but hopefully very enjoyable if you despise and detest climate change denial, as I do. But first, an explanation of the circumstances.

The other day, on Twitter, I indulged in a bit of regular fun-poking at James Delingpole, as I often do because, quite simply, the man just invites it. For those not in the know, Delingpole is a pretty nasty character really. He writes regular blog pieces and op-eds for Breitbart and The Spectator, usually on climate change, but also on other subjects as well. He is usually, and seemingly, unashamedly vicious, as will become apparent in my coverage of him and his behaviour in this piece. Given his behaviour, I am not afraid, occasionally to indulge in a bit of 'ad-hominem' warfare myself, ind…

Array Technologies leads US market in solar tracker shipments

5 Companies and Their Efforts to Reduce the Environmental Impact of Manufacturing

By Rana Tarakji
The Industrial Revolution has undoubtedly affected the environment. From pollution to global warming, the environment has taken on a lot of the burden for many of the advancements that humans have enjoyed.
Unfortunately, the manufacturing industry is one of the biggest contributors to the significant damages and hazards on the environment. Manufacturing companies are among the biggest producers of solid, liquid, and gaseous wastes that lead to huge levels of pollution.
Although many manufacturing companies still do not have policies and practices in place to reduce their negative impact on the environment, there are many who are taking the lead to a more sustainable and environment-friendly approach.
Coca Cola When it comes to beverage manufacturers, Coca Cola is among the biggest around the world. They have started taking on a more responsible environmental commitment by making water preservation, sustainable packaging, and energy and climate protection among their goals.…