Skip to main content

UK Climate Change Plan to hit poorest harder according to CSE

Source: Centre for Sustainable Energy
http://www.cse.org.uk/projects/view/1143

A recent study by the Centre for Sustainable Energy and the Association for the Conservation of Energy (ACE) has found that the impacts of the government's Low Carbon Transition Plan will hit poorer households harder in real terms.
The study pursued four main lines of enquiry:
  • What needs to be done to UK housing, in terms of sustainable energy deployment, in order to meet the target of 15% reduction by 2020.
  • The proportion of this target to be met by renewable heat, renewable power and energy conservation.
  • The range and size of technology required.
  • The cost of meeting these targets and how these costs are recovered through domestic energy bills, income tax or a financial transaction tax.

The study found that if the costs are recovered through domestic energy bills, the average household energy expenditure in 2020 will increase by £103 (assuming an existing figure in 2020 of £1,154) representing a rise of 8.5%. In general, because the poor tend to spend more of their household income on energy, this will hit poorer households harder.

If, however, costs are recovered through income tax, the figure will decrease by £193 (16%) as households benefit from insulation and micro-renewables but don't pay for these through energy bills. This will, however, mean a decrease of £309 in annual household income as the average household will be £116 worse off. Under the income tax regime, poorer households will see a surplus of £96 as they pay less income tax, that is to say their savings on energy will compensate for the loss in household income. One of the reports authors, CSE's Ian Preston commented that the research "appears to show that the use of energy bills to recover the cost of climate change policies is more regressive - it hits the poor harder than the rich - than the taxation route". Preston also stated that the use of income tax to recover costs would be unlikely under the present economic circumstances and that therefore if energy bills are used, then this should be done as quickly as possible. His recommendations are that firstly no one fuel should be burdened by recovery costs (for example piling the costs on electricity will hit the poor hardest), secondly expenditure on measures should be implemented according to the householder rather than the house and thirdly tariffs should be designed to penalise high consumers while protecting the vulnerable.

The report, entitled The Distributional Impacts of UK Climate Change Policies is available on the CSE website (see link above)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Battle of the Blogs? Whitlock goes to War...

Good day folks, you're all in for a bit of a treat as it happens, so I hope you're sitting comfortably. Before I go any further, I should issue a 'long read' warning. This blog piece is going to be fairly long, quite involved in its detail, but hopefully very enjoyable if you despise and detest climate change denial, as I do. But first, an explanation of the circumstances.

The other day, on Twitter, I indulged in a bit of regular fun-poking at James Delingpole, as I often do because, quite simply, the man just invites it. For those not in the know, Delingpole is a pretty nasty character really. He writes regular blog pieces and op-eds for Breitbart and The Spectator, usually on climate change, but also on other subjects as well. He is usually, and seemingly, unashamedly vicious, as will become apparent in my coverage of him and his behaviour in this piece. Given his behaviour, I am not afraid, occasionally to indulge in a bit of 'ad-hominem' warfare myself, ind…

Array Technologies leads US market in solar tracker shipments

5 Companies and Their Efforts to Reduce the Environmental Impact of Manufacturing

By Rana Tarakji
The Industrial Revolution has undoubtedly affected the environment. From pollution to global warming, the environment has taken on a lot of the burden for many of the advancements that humans have enjoyed.
Unfortunately, the manufacturing industry is one of the biggest contributors to the significant damages and hazards on the environment. Manufacturing companies are among the biggest producers of solid, liquid, and gaseous wastes that lead to huge levels of pollution.
Although many manufacturing companies still do not have policies and practices in place to reduce their negative impact on the environment, there are many who are taking the lead to a more sustainable and environment-friendly approach.
Coca Cola When it comes to beverage manufacturers, Coca Cola is among the biggest around the world. They have started taking on a more responsible environmental commitment by making water preservation, sustainable packaging, and energy and climate protection among their goals.…